Bandura theories social cognition Essay

Albert Bandura`s social learning theory places learning in a social context. Bandura and his colleagues take the position that personality is acquired, or learned behavior. In particular, Bandura`s insistence that behavior can be learned from mere observation is a significant departure from Skinner’s behaviorist position. An original empirical demonstration of observational learning was presented in a study by Bandura, Ross, and Ross (1993). Nursery school children were allowed to watch an adult’s unusual aggressive actions against an inflated Bobo doll – the kind that pops back up after it has been punched or knocked down. The adult models hit the doll with a hammer and kicked it, tossed it in the air, and even sat on it and punched it. After merely observing this behavior, the children were later allowed to play with toys that included the Bobo doll and hammer. The children who observed the adult model, either live or on videotape, hit the doll more frequently than a control group who had not seen a model. They also tended to hit the doll the way they had observed the adult model do it. Bandura interpreted this study as demonstrating that the probability of behavior can be strengthened through observation. Indeed, in Bandura`s approach to personality, much of one’s behavior is learned and strengthened through imitation, which is a kind of social cognition learning. In this term paper I address the difference in the effectiveness of using simulation intervention program based on a Bandura`s Social learning theory. Moreover, to find out if the program improves either or both the quality and speed of the learning process of students enrolled in a highly technical training program. This term paper focuses on using simulation based learning environments in vocational training program. In this paper, the experimental methodology and instruments are described, results and findings presented and finally discussed and concluded. METHODOLOGY Doing my research on Bandura`s Social learning theory in complex simulation-based learning environments, I experienced a large difference in how learners reacted to my learning material (Kluge, in press, 2004). Complex technical simulations involve the placement of the learner into a realistic computer simulated situation or technical scenario which puts control back into the learner’s hands. The contextual content of simulations allows the learner to â€Å"learn by doing. † Although my primary purpose was in improving research methods and testing procedures for evaluating learning results of simulation-based learning, the different reaction of the participants were so obvious that I took a closer look. I had two different groups participating in my learning experiments: students from an engineering department at the University, mostly in their 3rd semester, and apprentices from vocational training programs in mechanics and electronics of several companies near the University area in their 3rd year of vocational training. Most of the students worked very intensively and concentrated on solving these complex simulation tasks whereas apprentices became easily frustrated and bored. Purposes of the Study Although my first research purpose was not in investigating the differences between these groups, colleagues and practitioners showed their interest and encouraged me to look especially at that difference. Practitioners especially hoped to find explanations why apprentices sometimes are less enthusiastic about simulation learning although it is said to be motivating for their perception. As mentioned above, my primary purpose when I started to investigate learning and simulation based on Bandura`s Social Cognition theories was focused on improving the research methodology and test material (see Kluge, in press, 2004) for experimenting with simulation-based learning environments. But observing the subjects’ reactions to the learning and testing material the question arose whether there might be a difference in the quality of and speed of the learning process of students involved in my study. Research Design A 3-factor 2 ? 2 ? 2 factorial control-group-design was performed (factor 1: â€Å"Simulation complexity†: ColorSim 5 vs ColorSim 7; factor 2: â€Å"support method†: GES vs. DI-GES; factor 3: target group, see Table 2). Two hundred and fifteen mostly male students (16% female) in eight groups (separated into four experimental and four control groups) participated in the main study. The control group served as a treatment check for the learning phase and to demonstrate whether subjects acquired any knowledge within the learning-phase. While the experimental groups filled in the knowledge test at the end of the experiment (after the learning and the transfer tasks), the control groups filled in the knowledge test directly after the learning phase. I did not want to give the knowledge test to the experimental group after the learning phase because of its sensitivity to testing-effects. I assumed that learners who did not acquire the relevant knowledge in the learning phase could acquire useful knowledge by taking the knowledge test, which could have led to a better transfer performance which is not due to the learning method but caused by learning from taking the knowledge test. The procedure subjects had to follow included a learning phase in which they explored the structure of the simulation aiming at knowledge acquisition. After the learning phase, subjects first had to fill in the four-item questionnaire on self-efficacy before they performed 18 transfer tasks. The transfer tasks were separated into two blocks (consisting of nine control tasks each) by a 30-minute break. In four experimental groups (EG), 117 students and apprentices performed the learning phase (28 female participants), the 18 control tasks and the knowledge test. As said before, the knowledge test was applied at the end because of its sensitivity to additional learning effects caused by filling in the knowledge test. In four control groups (CG), 98 students and apprentices performed the knowledge test directly after the learning phase, without working on the transfer task (four female participants). The EGs took about 2-2. 5 hours and the CG about 1. 5 hours to finish the experiment. Both groups (EGs and CGs) were asked to take notes during the learning phase. Subjects were randomly assigned to the EGs and CGs, nonetheless ensuring that the same number of students and apprentices were in each group.

Ethical Decision-Making Model Paper Essay

Ethics are not gained in one day. Ethics are built over time from experiences. From childhood to adulthood these learned behaviors add to traits that help shape an individual; they complete who one is and what one believes. Ethics guides individual’s understandings of the concepts of right and wrong. In everything one does, decision-making is involved. Work, school, home, and communications, ethical beliefs are challenged. Ethics guide one’s thought process for these challenges and help approach any situation long before it happens. Ethics are rules and standards governing the conduct in which one lives and makes life decisions. Building ethics is a learning process; the things one learns, as one grows, will govern and guide the rest of one’s life. Ethics are important to today’s society. Individuals tend to face stressful situations by ignoring ethics and doing their own thing. This is why ethics play a significant role in communication. Ethical communication encompasses one being honest in all communications; keeping an honest and open opinions towards others. In some business situations, ethical communication involves keeping confidential information confidential, and not discussing personal business. In the more public the position, there is a greater need for ethical principles. Ethical communication help promote access to opportunities necessary to fulfill human potential; to help contribute to business, families, communities, and society in general. Ethical communications promote caring climates and mutual understandings that respect the unique needs and characteristics of every individual. It is being committed to courageous expression of personal convictions to pursuit fairness and justice. There are various forms of ethical decision-making processes. There is Aristotle’s  Mean, Confucius’s Golden Mean, Kant’s Categorical Imperative, Islam’s Divine Command, Mill’s Principl e of Utility, Rawls’s Veil of Ignorance, and Judeo-Christian Persons and Ends. A few personal favorites, Aristotle’s, Confucius’, and Mill’s process of thinking. Aristotle’s ethics fits deduces facts about the nature of the world and the nature of man by the use of reason. Aristotle’s ethics are an example of virtue ethics. Virtue ethics concentrates on the worth of the moral agent and not the consequences of his or her actions; â€Å"good cannot be identical for all men† (Learning activity- transcript ethics: what is right?, 2012). Confucius emphasized personal and governmental morality, correctness of social relationships, justice and sincerity. Confucius’s Golden Mean is a golden rule; do not do to others what you do not wish for yourself. Mill’s process of thinking; â€Å"Mill believed that every individual has sovereignty over his or her own body, psyche and spirit† (Learning activity- transcript ethics: what is right?, 2012). Mill followed more of a utilitarianism method which proposed that this principle should be used mainly in determining the value of rules such as do not kill, do not lie, do not steal, and so forth. The ethic process that I bleive to be better is John Stuart Mill’s. I choose Mill’s, because Mill believes that we as people have control over our actions and within our conscience minds, we know right from wrong. Mill’s Principle of Utility is the easiest for a majority of people to follow. It leads to morally sound decisions, handling moral dilemmas, and helps to make effective moral decisions. â€Å"The principle of utility determines the rightness of acts (or rules of action) by their effect on the total happiness† (Learning activity- transcript ethics: what is right?, 2012). For example, within everything one does decisions have to be made. Morally we know what it is right and wrong, because many individuals are brought up that way. In a business environment, every individual is personally responsible for themselves, for being honest, and respectful. As a worker, I follow not only my ethics but those of the company. â€Å"All of our directors, officers and associates must conduct themselves accordingly and seek to avoid even the appearance of improper behavior† (Code of business conduct and ethics, 2015). For example, answering the phone we are to be polite and respectful throughout the entire phone call. Customers will call to ask questions if we have a certain product in stock or the product at all. I answered the phone and was asked  if there were any karaoke radios in stock. I turned to my co-worker to ask her, she replied â€Å"Just tell them no.† I was shocked at her response. Instead of telling the customer no, I put them on hold and searched myself. I knew in my conscience mind it would be wrong for me not too. I would rather speak the truth (John Stuart Mills Utility) and avoid a communication dispute later. Ethics and morals are crucial concepts in today’s world. Ethics are rules and standards governing the conduct in which one lives and makes life decisions. Ethics build traits that help shape an individual beliefs and help shape and understanding of right and wrong. Every day one’s ethics are challenged by work, school, home, and most importantly communication. It is important to understand how to react to a particular situation long before that situation happens. Building ethics and communication ethics is a learning process, but the things one learns, as one grows, will govern and guide the rest of one’s life. Living by John Stuarts Mill’s Utility can promote an environment every individual can live in of fairness and justice. References Code of business conduct and ethics. (2015). Retrieved from Big Lots Inc.: http://www.biglots.com/corporate/careers/corporate-culture Learning activity- transcript ethics: what is right? (2012). Retrieved from University of Phoenix: https://newclassroom3.phoenix.edu/Classroom/#/contextid/OSIRIS:48172976/context/co/view/activityDetails/activity/f3640959-b484-4642-9f12-326e54bc3a54/expanded/False

The Significance of Privilege

Privilege and its significance Privilege is a particular advantage or a particular right which is available for a specific group and or a peculiar individual while opposite to this ; the disadvantage means the group who can non bask those benefits or advantages which the particular group is taking as privilege. In other words, we can state that privilege is a kind of favoritism where one is basking some benefit while the other is non eligible to take that benefit ( Kimberly ; 73 ) . Bing a male, I think that we should non wait for such jurisprudence or we must non propose authorities to go through the policies against favoring but the whole community must work on it to extinguish the construct of favoring. We must hold voice for equality in the society. In article, â€Å"Michael M. vs. Superior Court of Sonoma County† , there was contention non around the instance but around the issue. I feel a review against the suspect that why he charged Michael with statutory colza although it seems a physical colza as it was portraying that Michael forced Sharon until she submitted for the sex. I felt that Michael must non be charged with physical colza because Sharon was besides responsible for the whole bad luck. They drank together ; they left group together, their arousal and their intimacy, it all made the state of affairs of bad luck. By reading this I feel two sorts of privileges were given two Sharon, the first is her gender and the second was age. They both were guilty, but as Michael was of 18 and Sharon was 17, so Sharon was privileged because of her age and Michael was punished merely. Sharon must be punished as she encouraged Michael for this onslaught. This instance is a clear illustration that the privilege is a sort of favoritism. While populating in a same community and society, we do non hold right to know apart our determinations on the footing of age or gender. Both Sharon and Michael must penalize every bit because they were every bit responsible for their Acts of the Apostless. It was right determination to bear down him against the statutory colza but the same determination must be taken for the Sharon as she motivated Michael for the sex. In the instance between Mcleskey V. Kemp, the issue was raised that on the footing of the races, black adult male are punished more often as compared to the white one ( Mcleskey ; 1 ) . We have a clear white privileged over the black disadvantaged in the society of USA. This instance can besides back up my sentiment that privilege is favoritism. While populating in a same society, why two people or group of people is been handling otherwise. White privilege is a set of benefits that white can avail in the same economic, political and societal fortunes but the inkinesss can non avail. This set of benefit includes greater societal position, cultural avowals, and freedom to purchase, drama, move, speak and work freely. White privilege is a sort of racism. I do non state that white people deliberately or accidentally do this favoritism or ache the black one, but they are unfamiliar with their white-color privilege. It is wholly at opportunity that single will be treated as a alone human being but taking into histories the race of a victim or suspect while make up one's minding that if punishment of decease should be imposed. Further, Mcleskey is right that in malice of sing race or colour, it is better to see that what quality does those single posses ( Mcleskey ; 8 ) . Two people may belong to same race but their qualities will be different so in order to convey equality in society, it is of import to detect every individual separately non with the race. By his statements we can state that handling two people otherwise with response to his or her race is besides a privilege for one who will be treated as holding good race over the 1 who is non good in the oculus of judge. In another manner, we can state that this is a racial favoritism where 1 is acquiring benefit over the other. This is why, it is my sentiment that privilege is a sort of favoritism. By taking another illustration of instance held between Rostker v. Goldberg, which was on the determination of the U.S Supreme Court keeping that the pattern of necessitating merely work forces to register for the bill of exchange was constitutional. Robert challenged the bill of exchange enrollment policy of U.S.A. and suit against the manager of Selective service system named Bernard Rostker. After the tribunal Sessionss, it announced that it was legal to register merely work forces for the bill of exchange. Then Robert L. Goldberg challenged in the tribunal that the gender differentiation is unconstitutional for this jurisprudence as it is â€Å"only men† . After 6 to 3 determinations, U.S Supreme tribunal announced that neither this is gender favoritism nor this Act violated the equal protection of Torahs. At the terminal tribunal decided that this Act would remain passed as it is. Although the tribunal does non alter its determination but it is a clear gender based determination where merely work forces will be merely at that place to register for the bill of exchange. In article â€Å"Overcoming Racism in Environmental Decision† , Bullard said that there is a large societal job that is economic and racial minorities are forced to digest the economic loads. Bullard claimed that this environmental unfairness violates societal, geographic, and procedural equity.He besides proposed five basicss of environmental justness to authorities that how to rectify the job. Bullard said that in order to extinguish the ailments of sexism and racism from the society, it is of import to take favoritism from top to down. It can be done by sing the jobs and demands of disadvantaged where necessary and with remarking and reconstituting the universe where would see that how to give benefit to the disadvantaged. Through his survey, it seems clearly that he has believed in it that there is favoritism among different races. I am besides in the same sentiment that society trades different races otherwise which is doing a major rise in the societal ailments. In order to take the societal ailments from the society, it is of import to extinguish favoritism. Bullard survey is really important because of his environmental justness model. There should be â€Å"no forfeit zones† but environmental justness for all. In my sentiment, privilege is merely critical for jurisprudence. The privilege is critical if sound lawful exhortation is to be given in every field. It has a profound centrality in practically every circumstance where lawful counsel is looked for whether it is refering corporate and concern minutess, to household connexions, or to civil prosecution condemnable accusals. Family insider facts, organisation privileged penetrations, peculiar defects and injudiciousnesss all must now and once more be uncovered to the lawyer by the client. Without this benefit clients could ne'er be existent and equip all the important informations that must be given to legal counsellors on the off opportunity that they are to lawfully cheer their clients. It is a constituent that is both indispensable and to a great grade paramount to the working of the legitimate model. It is a consequence of the basic essentiality of the benefit that the burden lawfully rests upon those looking to put aside the benefit to legalize doing such a notable pace. Customer lawful privilege ( CLP ) , often alluded to as â€Å" legitimate proficient benefit † , is a typical jurisprudence right that exists to procure the organisation of equity and the right of people and different elements/associations to get secret counsel about their legitimate fortunes. It secures legitimate advocate given by an lawyer to his or her client ( exhortation benefit ) and interchanges associating to genuine or mulled over suit or tribunal minutess ( prosecution benefit ) . The best possible organisation of equity obliges that clients can talk uninhibitedly and evidently with their lawyer, without trepidation of unveiling any informations pertinent to the lawful counsel they are looking for. It is good comprehended that, without the benefit, legitimate incidents may be postponed or even lost as legal advisers will be unable to suitably talk to their client, or convey pertinent affairs to the consideration of the tribunal. Guaranting pragmatism and genuineness in such correspondences is critical, on the evidences that we live in a complex public sentiment and our Torahs and lawful model are on juncture exceptionally muddled. It is in the public oculus ‘s investing that persons ( numbering organisations ) look for legitimate exhortations about their issues and in looking for counsel don’t hesitate to unveil all important certainties. The multilateral quality of these Torahs is coupled with spread outing dependance on ego ordinance by the group, for case the self rating agreement of appraisal.

Animal Testing is Wrong Essay Example for Free

Animal Testing is Wrong Essay Animal testing is cruel and inhuman! It is morally wrong to toture animals for our own benefit. Over 3 million animals have been tormented all in the name of research. It has been found that only 5-25% of side effects caused by medicines are accurately predicted. This leads me to wonder what is actually being gained by animal experimentation. It’s bad science! The Food and Drug Administration reported that 92 out of every 100 drugs that pass animal tests fail on humans, making it wasteful. In recent years there has been the recognition that animals rarely serve as good models for the human body. Animal experiments prolong the suffering of people waiting for effective cures by misleading experimenters and squandering precious money, time, and resources that could have been spent on human-relevant research. â€Å"In the name of science†, animal experiments globally are around 100 million experiments each year. Cats, dogs, rabbits, mice and other animals, no different to those we have as pets, are used in experiments. Animals are force-fed harmful substances, infected with lethal viruses, subjected to brain damage, heart attacks, stokes, cancers and ultimately killed. Several cosmetic tests commonly performed on mice, rats, rabbits, and guinea pigs include:skin and eye irritation tests where chemicals are rubbed on shaved skin or dripped into the eyes without any pain relief. repeated force-feeding studies that last weeks or months, to look for signs of general illness or specific health hazards. widely condemned â€Å"lethal dose† tests, where animals are forced to swallow large amounts of a test chemical to determine what dose causes death. The fact that animals are used to study pain, depression, anxiety, and to test pain-killing drugs for human use, demonstrates that scientists recognize that animals are capable of suffering in many ways just like humans, but these sentient animals are unable to give their consent to participate in research. The fact that animals can suffer and experience pain is sufficient reason to refrain on moral grounds from harming them. Beyond pain, there is also persuasive evidence that animals, in particular mammals and birds, have thoughts, intentions, and memories. This means they can be harmed by confinement, frustration, fear, isolation, and loss of life – experiences unavoidable for animals confined in Laboratories and used in experiments. The measurement of stress hormones, and presence of ulcers, immune suppression, abnormal behavior and brain dysfunction in laboratory animals, provide further evidence that animals commonly used in labs do suffer pain and distress. Some people claim that because animals do not have duties or responsibilities in the way humans do, they are not deserving of the same protection. However, some humans have no responsibilities or duties, such as babies, the mentally ill, or very infirm, yet they are not stripped of their rights in this way. Indeed, such individuals are usually considered more deserving of protection, not less. Others argue that the potential benefit to human society justifies experiments on animals. However this argument is a slippery slope, as this reasoning would also justify experiments on a few non-consenting humans for the ultimate benefit of human society — a clearly unethical scenario. â€Å"If we didn’t use animals, we’d have to test new drugs on people. † The fact is that we already do test new drugs on people. No matter how many animal tests are undertaken, someone will always be the first human to be tested on. Because animal tests are so unreliable, they make those human trials all the more risky. What I have to wonder is why do we test on animals, or feel the need to have people volunteer for something potential dangerous with its unknown side effects when we have child molesters, rapists, and murderers in prison who are catered to three meals a day? I believe we should enact instead of animal testing, (which has been proven to be highly ineffective) testing on convicted criminals on death row, or prisoners looking to cut down some time in exchange for experimentation and observation. Animal Testing is Wrong. (2018, Nov 03).

Conference and Event Evaluation Report Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

Conference and Event Evaluation Report - Essay Example The motto of the agency is to provide better information and data to the public to enhance the health and living standards of the public. AIHW is a statutory authority and is answerable to the Parliament and works under the provision of Australian Institute of Health and Welfare Act 1987. The AIHW makes an elaborate national health report every two years which contains a wide range of information about health services, injury, diseases and health work force. This time the AIHW’s report release and conference fell on the same day which is 23rd of June 2010. According to AIHW(2010)â€Å"At the pre-conference dinner, 2010 Australian of the Year, Professor Patrick McGorry described his work in the field of mental health and in particular the prevalence of mental illness among young people†. The focus point of the conference was that the AIHW should create a transparency within the healthcare system to make the policy more comprehensive for the public Literature Review: Aust ralia Health Conference 2010 Australia is rated as one the healthiest nations in the world and their health awareness is of high quality when compared to other developed nation. The country was rated at third position for the life expectancy rate and health quotient among the developed countries. At the conference were present various health experts, high ranked officials of the nation and media persons to overview the health and welfare agenda of the body. According to AIHW (2010)â€Å"Launching the report, Minister Roxon said Australia’s Health 2010 was ‘a very valuable analysis of where we are as a nation, what we're doing well, where we need to pick up our game and the trends showing us the risks on the horizons that of course any smart government will plan for†. During the conference, it was understood that the death rate and major health problems such as cardiovascular disease, lung disease, asthma, cancer and injuries were decreasing .The report of the AIH W showed that the health of the citizens of Australia was really improving and there is more space for the country to develop in health sector. However, the conference also highlighted on the fact that the country needs to focus on certain areas of concern like obesity and diabetes.As per AGDHA(2010)â€Å"For the first time since 1995 the 2007-08 National Health Survey (NHS) has measured the height, weight, hip and waist circumference of respondents aged 5 years or more. Results from this survey reveal that in 2007-08, 61.4% of the Australian population are either overweight or obese† The health report of the AIHW shows that there can bring about considerable change in the obesity and overweight issues by bringing about change in the lifestyle of Australian citizen. The life style of a person includes their food habits, physical activity, alcohol consumption and smoking habits. According to the AIHW, the diabetes is one of the main issues prevalent among Australians which nee ds dire attention. Another important issue which was highlight in the conference was the prevalence of mental disorder among young generation of Australia. AIHW(2010)states thatâ€Å"An estimated 1 in 4 young people had experienced a mental health disorder in the 12 months before the survey—a higher proportion than any other age group. And in the estimates of disease burden for 2010, mental disorders

HEALTH LAW AND ETHICS Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words - 10

HEALTH LAW AND ETHICS - Essay Example sector has various stakeholders who include patients, payers, health providers, and employers who have different interests (Department of Community and Family Medicine Web). Most significantly, the administration faces a dilemma with their employees in the allocation of resources. The administration faces the dilemma of how to improve the healthcare. The administration must decide on whether to buy improved the health equipment, building more health facilities or increasing the remuneration of the care providers to motivate the provision of quality, accurate, and timely healthcare. Under the health laws, the patients have a right to receive efficient healthcare but on the other hand, the care providers have a right to better remuneration. Hence, law and ethics should fall in place in solving this dilemma. Indeed, the administration can liaise with the government, non-governmental organizations, and possible donors to help in funding improved health care equipment to guarantee better health services to the patients. At the same time, the administration should liaise with the health workers union to ascertain the remuneration standards of the caregivers a nd subsequently adjust it to recommended standards where possible. That way, the administration will solve the resources allocation

Financial analysis of BMW and Kraft Foods Essay

Financial analysis of BMW and Kraft Foods - Essay Example The researcher states that the profitability ratios of both the companies depict that Kraft Foods has higher profitability in terms of high operating margin, net profit margin and return on equity. Besides, both the firms had maintained their current ratio above 1. With respect to interest coverage ratio, BMW had higher rank than Kraft Foods which indicates that it has strong financial strength in the industry. The current economic crisis of 2008 had impacted on the financial performance of BMW Group. Due to bad financial condition, the spending of customers had reduced considerably which impacted on the expenditure on vehicles. As a result, the automobile industry had faced drop in sales volume. BMW Group was also unable to evade the impact of financial crisis and therefore the group income had reduced by 5% in the year 2008 to 53,197 million Euros. As the international economy was recovering from the clutches of economic crisis by the end of the year 2010, BMW Group was able to rec over its financial position in the automobile market. The global automobile industry has also become stabilised to certain degree. In 2010, BMW Group had experienced severe increase in sales revenue by 19.3% than 2009 to 60,477 million Euros. Kraft Foods is a financially stable company with revenues of 40.4 billion USD in the year 2009. In the year 2009, the total value of net assets of the company was 25.9 billion USD. Despite bad economic conditions, the revenue of Kraft Foods was slightly affected. In 2007, the net revenue was 35,858 million USD which had increased to 41,932 million USD in 2008 (Kraft Foods Inc, 2010). Ratio Analysis Valuation Ratio Price-Earnings (P/E) Ratio Price-Earnings or P/E Ratio is the ratio of organisation’s share price with earning per share. From the analysis of BMW, it can be observed that the earnings per share of BMW Group had decreased considerably in the time of 2008 to 2009 to 0.49 Euro and 0.31 Euro and increased in 2010 to 4.91 Euro. His torically, the P/E ratio of BMW Group was strong and was always more than the industry average which is around 15-25. In the year 2007, the P/E ratio was below average i.e. 8.5 which had increased to 11.98 in 2010 (BMW Group, 2008; 2010). The price earnings ratio of Kraft Foods was